 |
| 
|
|
"Going Upriver": John Kerry leans to listen to his friend,
David Thorne, during the 1971 Vietnam Veterans Against
the
War protests
on
the
Mall.
Photo:
George Butler
|

Politics Goes to the Movies: "Going
Upriver:
The Long War of John Kerry" and
"Chisholm '72: Unbought and Unbossed"
By Esther
Iverem
SeeingBlack.com Editor and Film Critic
Talk
about these movies and Black film issues! Click here.
On the coattails of director Michael Moore's success with "Fahrenheit
9/11" and "Bowling for Columbine," more documentaries
that tackle political and social issues are being released in movie
theaters. "Going Upriver: The Long War of John Kerry" is
in wide theatrical release, and several other documentaries are
in limited release, or are scheduled for individual screenings.
In this part, we will review "Going Upriver" and "Chisolm
'72: Unbought and Unbossed."
"Going
Upriver: The Long War of John Kerry"
The release of "Going Upriver: The Long War of John Kerry," during
in the heat of the American presidential campaign, forces this
92-minute documentary into the war of words of the election season—talk
of swift boats, discarded ribbons, heroism and patriotism. And
this likely pigeonholing is too bad. This film is far more important
for sharing the horror of the Vietnam War from the perspective
of the Vietnam veteran, than it is for detailing the start of Kerry's
public service career.
If judged solely by its likely impact on the race, it is likely
to be a help, rather than a hindrance, to the Democratic presidential
nominee. Director George Butler, who is Kerry's longtime
friend, weaves together a story of one war and one man, offering
insight into how a deadly and pointless conflict shaped Kerry's
time as a soldier, and then how, disillusioned by war, Kerry helped
to bring the soldiers home. By its end, the Vietnam War claimed
the lives of more than 58,000 Americans, and the lives of 3 million
Vietnamese.
Through interviews with experts such as historian-journalist Neil
Sheehan, this film covers the painful turf covered by many White
Americans when they talk about the Vietnam War, or war in general.
If even as a subtext, they are usually talking about the divide
between those who believe that a good American citizen always supports
their government during a war, and those people who believe that
good citizenship includes dissent from, and protest against, the
government.
But as people of color, against whom these wars of mass bombings
and countless civilians deaths are fought, the war rift is also
this: when does American citizenship involve including people of
color in the definition of humanity? When the super power war machine
goes into gear, who are the White people who will stand up and
not fall under the mantra-talk of gooks, or towelheads, or sandniggers
as the enemy? Who will have human decency and moral courage?
This film demonstrates that, as a soldier, and in leading a march
of veterans on the national mall, Kerry had that moral courage.
His testimony at the end of the protest before the Senate Foreign
Relations Committee was eloquent and moving. "….How
do you ask a man to be the last man to die in Vietnam?" he
said to the senators. "How do you ask a man to be the last
man to die for a mistake?"
By the end of this film, however, you might wonder how to reconcile
Kerry's clarity about ending the Vietnam War with Kerry's
indecisiveness about ending the war in Iraq. The film does not
go that far or draw those types of comparisons. It asks a lot of
relevant questions but, as it only hints of Kerry's life
after the Vietnam conflict, it leaves us clueless about his evolution
in thinking today.
Without direct comparison, and through the simple telling of history
with archival footage and photographs, "Going Upriver" does
provide eerie examples of how American political maneuvering and
military atrocities during the Vietnam War so closely mirror those
occurring today in Iraq. Just as Americans were led into Vietnam
under the guise of defeating the so-called spread of communism,
Americans were led into Iraq under the guise of defeating terrorism
and destroying nonexistent "weapons of mass destruction." Just
as American soldiers in Vietnam were told erroneously that they
were liberating the Vietnamese people who welcomed them, soldiers
today have been given similarly incorrect information about the
sentiment of Iraqis.
Especially powerful and grim is footage of Vietnam veterans giving
testimony at the Winter Soldier Investigation, organized by the
Vietnam Veterans Against the War and several anti-war artists,
including Jane Fonda, Graham Nash, David Crosby and Donald Sutherland,
in Detroit. Their stories ask us to consider what voices we hear,
and how—then and now—we measure ideas of patriotism
and citizenship.
"Chisholm '72:
Unbought and Unbossed"
|

|
A new documentary explores
Shirley Chisholm's historic
1972 presidential campaign.
|
The bold campaign for the U.S. presidency in 1972 by Congresswoman
Shirley Chisholm (D-New York) is one of those facts of Black history
that could easily be forgotten unless we tell the story. In the
new documentary, "Chisholm '72: Unbought and Unbossed," which
is being screened around the country, director Shola Lynch does
just that: in a taut, well-organized 76 minutes, she chronicles
Chisholm's campaign and how it fit into politically turbulent
times that still shape the United States today
When Chisholm announced her candidacy, she had already made history
in 1968 as the first Black woman elected to the U.S. Congress.
She represented New York's 12th Congressional District of
New York in Brooklyn. At that time, she had broken a barrier not
only in Congress, where she faced a cold shoulder and random insults
from colleagues, but also in the Black Congressional Caucus, a
boys-only club that included many representatives newly elected
after the passage of the 1965 Voting Rights Act.
She was a newcomer, a maverick and an outsider to the Washington
establishment, including the media, so the announcement of her
presidential candidacy was considered a joke. When Walter Cronkite
announced her entrance into the race, he said that she'd
thrown her "bonnet" into the ring. She was not taken
seriously, except by the tens of thousands who gathered to support
her around the country.
Through interviews with Chisholm volunteers, including Barbara
Lee, now a Congresswoman herself from California (and the only
member of Congress to vote against the authorization to go to war
with Iraq), Lynch ably captures the energy and excitement of the
campaign. She also details the opposition it faced from both ends
of the political spectrum. Racists sent hate mail and Chisholm
was even stalked by a man armed with a ten-inch knife. On the other
hand, the progressive wing of the Democratic Party, embodied by
Sen. George McGovern, was very concerned about Chisholm siphoning
away Black support. At some point, Chisholm was forced into court
to get equal time in a presidential debate.
One of the most fascinating topics explored only in part by the
film is how Chisholm did not enjoy full support within the Black
community. Some, such as Congressman William Clay of Louisiana,
were suspicious of Chisholm's motives or of her support from
the White women's movement. Some were jealous, or may have
felt that Chisholm,with her church lady wigs and wide wire-frame
glasses, did not embody the Black aesthetic or rhetoric of the
time. Some did not feel it was the "right time" for
such a run. In the end, at the Democratic Convention in Miami,
even those who had steadfastly stood by her, such as Representative
Ron Dellums of California, threw their support behind McGovern,
who went on to lose to Richard M. Nixon in a landslide vote. President
Nixon was then forced to resign two years later under threat of
impeachment due to the Watergate scandal.
Lynch is obviously sympathetic to Chisholm but she does offer
time for Dellums, Walter Fauntroy and others to state their point
of view. She also includes footage from the 1972 Black Political
Convention in Gary, Indiana, which Chisholm did not attend, and
during which the delegates decided not to endorse any presidential
candidate. Interviewed about the convention, poet and author Amiri
Baraka said that by not going to Gary, Chisholm played into the
hands of her enemies.
Lynch loses some of the strength of her film by not including
more about the initial spark that motivated Chisholm's run,
or details about Chisholm's plans for the country if elected.
There is the hint that Chisholm was an advocate for government
policies to strengthen families, including Head Start and day care,
but there is little inclusion of her fierce opposition to the Vietnam
War, or her championing of other social reforms. The absence of
this information creates a void in the film that leaves Chisholm
surrounded by questions, the same questions that dogged her campaign
more than 30 years ago.
Related Sites:
Iverem's reviews of "Going Upriver: The Long War of
John Kerry" and "Chisholm '72: Unbought and Unbossed" also
appeared on www.BET.com.
—October 8, 2004

© Copyright
2001-05 Seeing Black, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
|